Link Building Articles

Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing

November 1st, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in Practical Ecommerce

Effective search engine optimization (SEO) starts with keyword research. If you chase after the wrong keywords, your search engine optimization efforts will be a waste of time.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing digg this:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing spurl this:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing furl this:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing reddit this:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing Add to Y!:Search Engine Optimization: Keyword Sleuthing

The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank

November 1st, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Links are the currency of the Web, so it is important to have a plan in place to improve the number and quality of the links to your site from the outside.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank digg this:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank spurl this:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank furl this:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank reddit this:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank Add to Y!:The Secrets of Building Links and Increasing PageRank

Blogging Builds Brands

October 18th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in All About Branding.com

Blogging is one of the hottest trends on the net. A blog (short for “web log”) is a web-based diary where the author can ruminate on whatever strikes his or her fancy. The blogger may share photos, poetry, political views, gossip, industry trends, business advice, or the latest on their personal life. By definition, blogs are organized in reverse chronological order. Many are updated daily. They can have one or multiple authors, such as a community blog.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Blogging Builds Brands digg this:Blogging Builds Brands spurl this:Blogging Builds Brands furl this:Blogging Builds Brands reddit this:Blogging Builds Brands Add to Y!:Blogging Builds Brands

Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2)

October 11th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

The most important aspect of buzz marketing is being able to create a story that consumers as well as the media will find interesting and relevant. That story can be simple—but it must be visual. It can start with a product, but it must have a contagious element added in. The reason that people talked about the Palm Pilot, for example, was its “wow” effect—and it was visible. Some may say this is not part of marketing. Our panel disagrees.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2) digg this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2) spurl this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2) furl this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2) reddit this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2) Add to Y!:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 2 of 2)

Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2)

October 4th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Your brand, products and services all benefit when people are talking about you in positive terms. Word-of-mouth can be a wonderful tool to add to your marketing arsenal. Of course, it’s not new, so how has word-of-mouth marketing—also known as buzz marketing—evolved into the 21st century? How does it differ from viral marketing or customer evangelism? And how do marketers use buzz marketing strategically?

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2) digg this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2) spurl this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2) furl this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2) reddit this:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2) Add to Y!:Thought Leaders Summit: The Buzz on Word-of-Mouth Marketing (Part 1 of 2)

To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads

August 31st, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

A few weeks back I blogged some advice here for business bloggers who might want to consider text link advertising as part of their blog marketing mix.

Well, there’s been a lot of controversy as of late about buying text links. Blogger Phil Ringnalder published a scathing post accusing publishing house O’Reilly of being a search engine spammer. O’Reilly’s founder, Tim O’Reilly, responded to the accusations on his own blog. Google engineer Matt Cutts posted a comment to Tim’s post admitting that Google has decreased the voting power of sites like perl.com and xml.com and downgraded the reputation of some of their outbound links. Ouch!

Matt’s (and presumably Google’s) position was loud and clear:

If you don’t want your own site to suffer the same fate as O’Reilly, you better tag your link ads with a rel=nofollow attribute so that you don’t pass any PageRank score to your advertisers.

In my mind, that doesn’t seem quite fair. Website owners and bloggers work hard to build a content-rich site with good PageRank score. Google’s black-or-white stance on this equates to a diminished earning ability for these websites by insisting webmasters cut off the flow of PageRank to their advertisers. This of course decreases the value of the link ads to those advertisers, and consequently the revenue likely to be realized from them. Granted, no savvy advertiser is going to buy a text link ad solely based on PageRank score, but PageRank does factor into the equation.

This makes me wonder what Google’s position is on BlogAds.com is, which is part banner ad, part text link ad. A good blog ad contains useful content. Why shouldn’t the blogger be allowed to “vouch for” (by not tagging the link with nofollow) the links contained within that ad if they so choose?

Most “white hat” SEOs such as Christine Churchill believe text link advertising is a legitimate practice. I agree with her.

I wonder what Google would do if all the websites across the Internet decided to take all their banner ad inventory they have and bypass the click-tracker redirect that counts all the clickthroughs. Suddenly all these new votes would start counting all over the Internet for commercial advertisers and sponsors. Wouldn’t that throw Google for a loop!

So what is the bottom line here for bloggers who are looking to advertise? It’s basically this: be discriminating in your link buying. Text link advertisements are not inherently evil. Just don’t buy ads on sites where any of the other advertisers on the site are misleading, deceptive or misrepresentative. By that, I mean things like the following:

  1. Setting the ad’s link text to some keyword-rich phrase that doesn’t accurately reflect the page that is linked to.
    e.g. An ad on SeacoastOnline.com proclaims “The North Face” but that isn’t The North Face!
  2. Linking the ad text to a landing page that is built for search engines and not for people.
    e.g. the “Discount Vacations” ad on DailyItem.com points to one of Orbitz’s many “doorway pages”.
  3. Hiding or obscuring the link so human visitors can’t see it, only search engines.
    e.g. Doing a “View Source” on the home page of PRNewswire.com reveals these hidden links:

    </noframes>
    <a href=”http://www.icrossing.com”>Search Engine Marketing</a>
    <a href=”http://sev.prnewswire.com”>Search Engine News Release Optimization</a>
    </frameset>

And it goes without saying that you should refrain from such practices yourself when you advertise.

This post is based on material taken from on my own blog across three separate posts: Link buying - ethical or unethical?, Buying links - Google’s perspective, and Buying link ads - the ethical debate rages.

Spread the word: delicious this:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads digg this:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads spurl this:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads furl this:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads reddit this:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads Add to Y!:To Buy or Not To Buy Text Link Ads

Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2

August 30th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Spam filters tend to be the bane of the email marketer’s existence. Getting past them is a serious challenge, and it is becoming increasingly harder. How can an email marketer consistently bypass those spam filters?

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2 digg this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2 spurl this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2 furl this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2 reddit this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2 Add to Y!:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 2

« Read the whole series: 1,2 »

Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1

August 23rd, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Left to its own devices, email marketing is unlikely to survive. However, if email marketers take responsibility for developing great strategy and execution, we are likely to bring on its evolution.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1 digg this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1 spurl this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1 furl this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1 reddit this:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1 Add to Y!:Thought Leaders Commune on Email Marketing - Part 1

« Read the whole series: 1,2 »

Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links

August 10th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

I’m a bit behind on my conference session blogging. Waaay too many parties going on; doesn’t leave much time for blogging. The Google Dance last night. Yahoo! party at Great America the night before. And tonight I’ve got another party to go to. Yesterday I spoke on RSS. I’ll post a recap on that session later.

I just attended “Search Engine Q&A On Links”, which was great. Lots of useful advice from Google and Yahoo! about linking (nobody seemed to want to ask poor Ask Jeeves any questions). It was funny how obviously diametrically opposed the engines were to the immediately prior session on “Buying and Selling Links”. It’s hard to reconcile the two different sets of advice. Matt in the hallway before this session was adamant: “Don’t buy links!”

Anyways, without any further ado, here’s the session recap:

Kaushal Kurapati from Ask Jeeves:
Be cautious of: reciprocal links and purchasing links
Avoid: link farms, cloaking pages, invisible or hidden links that trick the crawler
Become an authority on a subject
Focus on your busines and content. Rest will follow. [I say: “yeah, right…”]
Teoma uses subject specific popularity: garner respect in your industry, subject-specific text based links can be understood. (hubs and authorities model)

Tim Mayer from Yahoo!:
Here’s some important news!! Yahoo! has just launched a brand new service: Site Explorer from Yahoo! Search. Stop scraping the Yahoo site for backlink results and use Site Explorer instead. Access via an API is offered too. And you can export as a CSV file.
Yahoo has 19.2 billion web objects in its index. Over 20 billion objects, when you include the audio and video.
Plans to use community to improve search quality. Social search = within a trusted network, where someone within your network vouches for a site.
Create natural linking strategies. when things start to look unnatural, is when you’ll start getting into trouble. We look at intent (linking to plasma TVs, diamonds, and Viagra all on the same page) and extent (i.e. what looks normal. Having everything on the page as links or 200 links on the page is too much!)
Yahoo! offers a much more comprehensive sample of backlinks than Google, but not a complete set of backlinks. New system (Site Explorer) will be reasonably comprehensive, in his opinion the most comprehensive out there.
It’s unnatural to link to sitemap-1 sitemap-2 sitemap-3 sitemap-4 sitemap-5. If you are doing this, you’re headed in the wrong direction.

Matt Cutts from Google:
Good links are earned links, links that are based on editorial discretion.
Create services that really useful. e.g newsletters, an article a day, syndicate through RSS (attribute my article and give me a link). start a blog.
Matt launched his blog today: mattcutts.com
Think outside the box.
Only SEOs and librarians do backlink searches. Historically we decided to dedicate a subset of our servers to backlinks. Only a sampling of backlinks would be displayed but only for a threshold of PageRank 4 or higher pages. A suggestion was made to show backlinks for lower PageRank pages too. We liked that idea so we now show a random sampling of backlinks, including low PageRank scoring pages too. We show twice as many backlinks as shown before, but still it’s only a sampling of the backlinks.
In graph theory, a clique in every node in the graph is very unnatural. So don’t link to every single node in your network of sites; it’ll get flagged.
For dynamic sites, you’re very safe if you have fewer than 2 parameters; keep the values of those parameters to fewer than 5 digits, and don’t name a parameter “id”. Googlebot sometimes tries variations of URLs by dropping parameters, but we only do that deep level analysis on big, quality sites.
Another good approach that alltheweb came up with: spider would always go 1 dynamic page deep from a static page.
Search engines only grab 100k or 200k or 500k so be careful loading up a huge page with a lot of links.
PageRank isn’t as important as SOME people make it out to be. BUT it’s NOT like “PageRank? Oh yeah let’s shuffle that one under the rug! That was sooo 4 years ago!”
“BO” = backlink obsession
We export PageRank only once every 3 months or so.

Technorati tag: Search Engine Strategies

Spread the word: delicious this:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links digg this:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links spurl this:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links furl this:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links reddit this:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links Add to Y!:Coverage of SES San Jose: Search Engine Q&A On Links

Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers

August 6th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Any search engine optimization consultant will tell you that links are the currency of the Web. They’re also the currency of the blogosphere. Without any inbound links, you’re just blogging to yourself. In Mike Grehan’s seminal piece “Filthy Linking Rich“, he explains how those rich with links just keep getting richer.

So how can new business bloggers get a jump start in the search engines? Simple: just whip out your wallet. The business of text link ad buying has matured, and it’s on the up-and-up. We’re not talking about “buying PageRank”… what we’re talking about is a totally legitimate business practice of buying text ads where you choose your hyperlinked words carefully based on keyword research and your advertisement appears on a reputable, relevant website. And of course, it links directly to your website, sans click tracking, so the ’search engine juice’ flows unhindered. If the practice weren’t legit, would you see such well-respected link-building pundits as Eric Ward on the board of the link broker Text-Link-Ads.com?

Buying links is not quite as simple as I make it out. Yes, you can use a broker and they’ll happily take your money. Caveat emptor! In order to make an informed purchase, you’ll need to evaluate the quality of the links using a number of criteria. Here’s such a list of criteria, courtesy of the ABAKUS SEO Blog:

  1. Inbound site traffic and page traffic.
  2. Inbound dot gov and dot edu links.
  3. Click though traffic you get from the page.
  4. Site in DMOZ and Yahoo directory.
  5. Age of domain and time of domain being used (longer the better).
  6. Inbound links shown to that page on Yahoo (link:http:www.domain.ext/page/).
  7. Ranking of page for the keywords it is optimized for.
  8. Relevance of theme of site and page to your site and page.
  9. Alexa ranking (lower is better).
  10. Deep link compared to home page links.
  11. Location of link.
  12. Length of allowed description text.
  13. PR of page (still matters a bit).

Personally, I’d also add to the list:

  1. Appearance of any link advertisers on the page that would attract the attention (negatively) of the search engines (e.g.: casinos, Texas Hold’em, Viagra, pharmaceuticals, insurance, Rolex, etc.)
  2. Quality of the landing pages of the existing link advertisers (if you find any are spammy-looking, turn and run!)
  3. Placement of the link. (i.e.: being relegated to the bottom of the page as footer links is not ideal)

Spread the word: delicious this:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers digg this:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers spurl this:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers furl this:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers reddit this:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers Add to Y!:Link Buying Basics for Business Bloggers

Pages (28): « First ... « 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 » ... Last »


Related tags

and/or
and/or
and/or

Newsletter

Web marketing virtuoso Stephan Spencer, shares a wealth of emarketing experience and hard-hitting, practical advice in our monthly newsletter. It's full of valuable insights...You should subscribe.








Latest posts
Latest comments


Contact Us

HEADQUARTERS
2820 Walton Commons West, Suite 123
Madison, WI 53718 USA
Phone: (608) 285-6600
Toll-free: 888 207-1109

REGIONAL OFFICE
36 Anzac Rd., Browns Bay
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: (+64) 9 476-4601
infodesk@netconcepts.com